Legal Opinion

Patrons' Mutual Fire Insurance v. Pagenkoff

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1921No. Docket No. 41PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Ingham; Wiest (Howard), J. Bill by the Patrons’ Mutual Fire Insurance Company of Michigan, Limited, against William Pagenkoff to cancel a policy of insurance, and to set aside an award by an adjusting board on said policy. From a decree for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

The bill of complaint in this case was

filed to cancel a policy of fire insurance and to set aside an award by an adjusting board, on the ground of misrepresentations by defendant in the written application for insurance, and in the sworn proofs of loss. Plaintiff is a domestic farmers’ insurance corporation, organized under Act No. 262, Pub. Acts 1895 (2 Comp. Laws 1915, § 9586 et seq.). Defendant is a resident of Menominee county. On May 22, 1915, he made written application for increase of insurance in plaintiff company. In such application he warranted his representations therein set forth…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Holcomb v. NobleMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Busch v. WilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Van Buren v. St. Joseph County Village Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. PeelerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Ætna Insurance v. ReshMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Citizens State Bank v. State Mutual Rodded Fire Ins.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Palmer v. Patrons' Mutual Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Jackson v. State Mutual Rodded Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Schaefer v. East & West InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Dakota Life Insurance v. MorganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API