Legal Opinion

National Surety Corporation v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 12, 1955No. 419-52, 149-53Published

1Opinion of the Court

133 F.Supp. 381 (1955)

NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION

v.

The UNITED STATES, The First National Bank in Houston, Third Party Defendant.

FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND

v.

The UNITED STATES. The First National Bank in Houston, Intervenor.

Nos. 419-52, 149-53.

United States Court of Claims.

July 12, 1955.

Emanuel Harris, New York City, for National Surety Corp. and Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland, and M. U. S. Kjorlaug, Houston, Tex., for First Nat. Bank in Houston. Max E. Greenberg, New York City, and Boyles & Billingsley, Houston, Tex., on the briefs.

Walter Kiechel, Jr., Washington, D. C.,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Henningsen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Martin v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. American Surety Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API