Radue v. Zanaty
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
HEFLIN, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from a dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. That judgment is affirmed.
The plaintiff-appellant in this case, Dr. Harland L. Radue, has been to this court before; see Radue v. Bradshaw, 289 Ala. 481, 268 So.2d 760 (1972). Indeed, the present case seems to be a sequel to his first case. The two cases, however, present different questions of law entirely.
Radue in 1969 was a Birmingham chiropractor. In that year he earned an income but failed'to file a state…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Norman v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Juilliard v. GreenmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. HenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Emery Bird Thayer Dry Goods Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Radue v. BradshawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. DaleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- City of Colton v. CorblySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Allen v. CraigCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1977
- Rothacker v. Rockwall County Central Appraisal DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Spurgeon v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.