Legal Opinion

Radue v. Zanaty

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 13, 1975No. SC 582PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEFLIN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. That judgment is affirmed.

The plaintiff-appellant in this case, Dr. Harland L. Radue, has been to this court before; see Radue v. Bradshaw, 289 Ala. 481, 268 So.2d 760 (1972). Indeed, the present case seems to be a sequel to his first case. The two cases, however, present different questions of law entirely.

Radue in 1969 was a Birmingham chiropractor. In that year he earned an income but failed'to file a state…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Norman v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Juilliard v. GreenmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Guaranty Trust Co. v. HenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Emery Bird Thayer Dry Goods Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  5. Radue v. BradshawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. DaleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. City of Colton v. CorblySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Allen v. CraigCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1977
  4. Rothacker v. Rockwall County Central Appraisal DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Spurgeon v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API