Weihe v. Statham
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
This is an action by the heirs of William W. Hill, deceased, against the administrator of the estate and his-bondsmen to recover upon the bond, because of the allowance by the administrator and the probate judge of a claim against the estate alleged to have been barred by the Statute of Limitations and otherwise invalid, and its subsequent payment in part by the administrator, but without an order of the Probate Court. It affirmatively appears from the complaint that the administration of the estate of the deceased Hill is still pending in the Probate Court, and that no account of his…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chaquette v. OrtetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- In re the Estate of LosheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Gilman v. CurtissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Estate of HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by12 opinions
- Selna v. SelnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Hudson v. BarrattSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
- Pennington v. NewmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- In re Mouillerat's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1894
- Haub v. LeggettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.