Smith v. Hull
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DARDEN, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Michael and Linda Smith appeal from the jury's verdict for Dewayne L. Hull, M.D. in their suit against Dr. Hull for medical malpractice.
We affirm.
ISSUE
Whether the trial court erred in instruct, ing the jury on the issue of contributory negligence.
FACTS
The evidence most favorable to the verdict reveals Dr. Hull, a plastic surgeon, formed a business entity known as Hair Research Associates in Fort Wayne for the purpose of injecting prosthetic human hair into the sealps of patients suffering from male pattern baldness. Dr. Hull obtained the human hair…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Memorial Hospital of South Bend, Inc. v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
- Fall v. WhiteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. BlaylockIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Harris v. CacdacIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
3Cited by13 opinions
- Faulk v. Northwest Radiologists, P.C.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- King v. ClarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Spar v. ChaIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
- Ob-Gyn Associates of Northern Indiana, P.C. v. RansbottomIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Smith v. WashingtonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.