King v. Clark

OPINION

BAKER, Judge

Appellants-plaintiffs Roberta King and Michael King (collectively the Kings) appeal the trial court’s denial of their motion for judgment on the evidence as the result of a jury’s verdict entered in favor of the appellee-de-fendant Dr. Jack P. Clark upon their complaint for medical malpractice. The Kings also claim that the trial court erroneously instructed the jury with respect to Dr. Clark’s affirmative defenses of contributory negligence and incurred risk. Furthermore, Dr. Clark cross-appeals the trial court’s failure to instruct the jury on the loss of chance doctrine…