Legal Opinion

Smith v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 21, 2014No. 1:14-cv-00165Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

OR|GINAL In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 14-165€ (Filed: August2l, 2014) >|<>l<>|=>|<*>l<>l<>|<>|<>l<*>k>l<>k>k>l<>l<>|<>l<>|<*>|<*>k>l<=l< LANKWARD L. SMITH, JR. F§§é Plaintijj", v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendam‘. >l<>|<>|<>|<>l<>l<>l<>l<>l<*>|=>l<>l<>|<>|<*>l<>l<>|<>l<>|<>l<=l=>|<>l<>l< ORDER In his complaint, Mr. Smith alleges that he timely filed the necessary paperwork to add his wife to his retirement annuity, but the Office of Personnel Management ("OPM") claims that it never received the original paperwork. If plaintiff were to add his wife to the annuity at this late…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Ashgar v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  3. Agee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  4. Doe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API