Legal Opinion
In Re Rakosi
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California
Decided May 3, 1989No. 19-00643PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LOUISE DeCARL MALUGEN, Bankruptcy Judge.
The dispute in this case is whether counsel for the Chapter 7 trustee is entitled to an award of professional fees for services rendered on behalf of the trustee after debtor Laszlo Rakosi converted his Chapter 7 case to a Chapter 13 case. Estes & Hoyt (“E & H”) represented the trustee, Corporate Management, Inc. (“CMI”) in the Chapter 7 case. After Rakosi converted to a Chapter 13, E & H continued to act on behalf of CMI by attending the § 341(a) hearing and interposing objections to the confirmation of debtor’s Chapter 13 plan and first…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Kroeger Properties and Development, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- In Re WellsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1988
- In Re RobertsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1988
- In re MeltonDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1986
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bruce K. Cable, as Debtor in Possession v. Ivy Tech State CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Searles v. Riley (In Re Searles)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- In Re DeLashUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2000
- In Re Milwaukee Boiler Manufacturing Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1999