In Re Kroeger Properties and Development, Inc.
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYERS, Bankruptcy Judge:
This is an appeal from a decision denying a nunc pro tunc order of appointment as counsel for the debtor in possession. Mr. Zilaff had served in fact as counsel for the debtor in possession for two years before he requested court approval. The reason given for this delay was simple neglect. None of the creditors nor the debtor in possession objected to Mr. Zilaff’s request for a nunc pro tunc order and it appears that when the estate is fully administered *822it will be solvent. While the trial court approved Mr. Zilaff’s appointment, it refused to provide that it…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Barry v. BarchiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Walters v. National Assn. of Radiation SurvivorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- In Re Nucorp Energy, Inc., an Ohio Corporation, and Its Affiliates, Debtors. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & ScrippsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- In the Matter of Triangle Chemicals, Inc., Debtor. Darryl Fanelli v. Nelson T. Hensley, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Detroit Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- In Re S.T.N. Enterprises, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1987
- In re JarvisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Peugeot v. United States Trustee (In Re Crayton)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- In re SingsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Republic Bank of California, N.A. v. Getzoff (In Re Getzoff)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.