Legal Opinion
Hein v. Emery (In Re Emery)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 6, 1985No. 19-11532PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EMIL F. GOLDHABER, Chief Judge:
The point in contention is whether we should grant relief on an attorney’s complaint against the debtor in which the plaintiff seeks an exception to the debtor’s discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code (“the Code”) based on the plaintiff’s allegations that the debtor fraudulently induced the plaintiff to provide legal services to the debtor although he had no intention of paying for such services. For the reasons outlined below, we conclude that the plaintiff failed to meet his burden of proof in establishing the requisite…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gleason v. ThawSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- In the Matter of Ron C. Cross, Bankrupt. Murphy & Robinson Investment Company v. Ron C. CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- In Re Charles Barry Rahm, Bankrupt. Ronald E. Gregg v. Charles Barry RahmCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Seiders v. Fenninger (In Re Fenninger)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
- Brennenstuhl v. Taylor (In Re Taylor)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Sears v. Faulk (In Re Faulk)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1986
- Leeb v. Guy (In Re Guy)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1988
- Sprague, Thall & Albert v. Woerner (In Re Woerner)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
- Fluehr v. Paolino (In Re Paolino)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Blackburn (In Re Blackburn)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.