Legal Opinion
Brennenstuhl v. Taylor (In Re Taylor)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 28, 1985No. 03-22716PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EMIL F. GOLDHABER, Bankruptcy Judge:
The inquiry in the matter at bench is whether we should grant a creditor an exception to discharge for a loan obligation where the debt was allegedly incurred by fraud. Since we find that the creditor failed to prove the requisite fraudulent intent for such a cause of action, we will deny the creditor’s request for an exception to discharge.
The facts of this controversy are summarized as follows: 1 The debtors and the creditor, George M. Brennenstuhl (“Bren-nenstuhl”), are neighbors within the City of Philadelphia. On numerous occasions Brennenstuhl…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re John Houtman and Gladys Irene Houtman, Bankrupts. John Houtman and Gladys Irene Houtman v. Edgar F. Mann and Edna M. Mann, Creditors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- In the Matter of Don Orriel Neis, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Herbert Tepper v. Frank H. Chichester, Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of Bennett-Manning Co., BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- Household Finance Corp. v. DannsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Seiders v. Fenninger (In Re Fenninger)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Sears v. Faulk (In Re Faulk)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1986
- Leeb v. Guy (In Re Guy)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1988
- Union National Bank of Marseilles v. Leigh (In Re Leigh)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
- Howard & Sons, Inc. v. Schmidt (In Re Schmidt)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1986
- United States v. StelweckDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.