Legal Opinion
City of Seattle v. McCready
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 4, 1994No. 60524-6PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.
James McCready and others opposed to Seattle’s Residential Housing Inspection Program challenge four inspections of two apartment buildings, one executed under a warrant and three pursuant to tenant consent. This is the second appeal arising from Seattle v. McCready, 123 Wn.2d 260, 868 P.2d 134 (1994) (McCready I), a declaratory judgment action filed by the City of Seattle (City). The first appeal was filed after the King County Superior Court ruled for the City on its claims (McCready I). This direct appeal is from an order dismissing the counterclaims and third party complaint filed in the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Columbia Basin Apartment Ass'n v. City of PascoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- State v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Kalmas v. WagnerWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Kalmas v. WagnerWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- City of Seattle v. McCreadyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.