Legal Opinion

Deist v. Wachholz

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1984No. 82-428Published

1Opinion of the Court

678 P.2d 188 (1984)

Joan A. DEIST, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

Paul D. WACHHOLZ, John R. Dittman, Van Kirke Nelson, and Conrad National Bank, Defendants and Appellants.

No. 82-428.

Supreme Court of Montana.

Decided February 22, 1984.

Submitted November 17, 1983.

As Modified April 10, 1984.

Rehearing Denied April 11, 1984.

Garlington, Lohn & Robinson, Gary L. Graham argued and Sherman V. Lohn argued, Missoula, Murphy, Robinson, Heckathorn & Phillips, Murray, Kaufman, Vidal & Gordon, Kalispell, for defendants and appellants.

Sharon Morrison argued, Helena, William Rossbach, Missoula, for plaintiff and…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dolton v. Capitol Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nColorado Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Stewart v. Phoenix National BankArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Tokarz v. Frontier Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  4. Deist v. WachholzMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Moschelle v. HulseMontana Supreme Court · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API