Legal Opinion

Stacey E. Schwarz v. Richard Schwarz and Lisa Schwarz (Mem. Dec.)

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 27, 2015No. 02A03-1407-CT-239Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Jan 27 2015, 10:02 am Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Mark S. Pantello Patrick J. Murphy Benson, Pantello, Morris, James & Logan, State Farm Litigation Counsel LLP Indianapolis, Indiana Fort Wayne, Indiana IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA Stacey E. Schwarz, January 27, 2015 Appellant, Court of Appeals Cause No.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Antonio Hughley v. State of Indiana, The Consolidated City of Indianapolis/Marion County, and The Indianapolis Metropolitan Police DepartmentIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Bagley v. Insight Communications Co., LPIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Hale v. Peabody Coal CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Carie v. PSI Energy, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Moberly v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API