Legal Opinion
Dugger v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided November 20, 1967No. Civ. A. 67-H-462PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NOEL, District Judge.
The plaintiff instituted this suit against his employer, Missouri Pacific Railroad, to recover damages for vacation benefits he asserts that he is entitled to under the Universal Military Training and Service Act, 50 U.S.C.App. § 459. The cause is before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The facts are not in dispute.
Dugger began working for the Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. in 1962 as a machinist apprentice at defendant’s Settegast Diesel Shop in Houston, Texas. At that time there was in effect a labor agreement between defendant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Helvering v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Trailmobile Co. v. WhirlsSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Accardi v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Siaskiewicz v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- John E. Kasmeier v. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
- Alvin J. Hollman v. Pratt & Whitney Aircraft, Etc., Howard B. Blakely v. Pratt & Whitney Aircraft, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Earl R. Foster v. Dravo CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Thomas C. Ewert v. Wrought Washer Mfg. Co., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
- Ewert v. Wrought Washer Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.