Legal Opinion

United States Steel Corp. v. Hoge

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 22, 1983No. 45 W.D. Appeal Dkt. 1983PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

The question presented by this appeal is which of the parties to a coal severance deed, or more precisely which of their successors in interest, is to be recognized as owner of coalbed gas. The Superior Court affirmed a final decree of the Court of Common Pleas of Greene County and quieted title to the gas in favor of the surface owners, permitting them to lease rights to drill into the coal seam to extract the coalbed gas contained therein, subject to restrictions imposed to prevent unreasonable damage to the coal owner’s property. U.S. Steel v. Hoge, 304 Pa.Super.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Westmoreland N. Gas Co. v. DeWittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  2. Chartiers Block Coal Co. v. MellonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  3. Dunham & Shortt v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  4. Webber v. VogelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  5. In MATTER OF CONVEYANCE OF LAND BELONGING TO CITY OF DuBOISSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Carbon County v. Union Reserve Coal Co., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. TW Phillips Gas and Oil Co. v. JedlickaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Huntley & Huntley, Inc. v. Council of OakmontSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Amoco Production Co. v. Southern Ute Indian TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Humberston v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API