Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Haight

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1939PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinbrink, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the amended complaint herein for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Four causes of action are pleaded. Under the first cause of action the plaintiff sues the defendant Films Incorporated (hereinafter referred to as the corporation) for breach of a contract of employment. The contract, a copy of which is annexed to the complaint, provides for the plaintiff’s employment “ as president and/or general manager for the period of ten years from the 31st of December, 1935, subject to the general control of ” the corporation, at a salary of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hornstein v. PodwitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Rice v. . ManleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Marks v. . CowdinNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Cuppy v. . Stollwerck BrothersNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Lukach v. BlairNew York Supreme Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Rudman v. Cowles Communications, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Greyhound Corp. v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  3. Terry v. ZachryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  4. Wilson & Co. v. United Packinghouse Wkrs. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1960
  5. Gulickson v. ForestDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API