Legal Opinion
McClarty v. Gudenau
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided October 7, 1994No. 2:93-cv-73427PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ROSEN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On June 11, 1993, Plaintiff Homer McClarty, on behalf of the bankruptcy estate of Debtor Maridarlene Fortney, filed a one-count complaint against Defendants, Dale Gudenau, Esq., and his law firm, Sullivan, Ward, Bone, Tyler & Asher, P.C. In his complaint, Plaintiff alleged that Mr. Gudenau committed legal malpractice in his representation of Mrs. Fortney in a civil action brought by Gerald and Rebecca McNaughton to recover for injuries sustained as a result of Mrs. Fortney’s negligent…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Friedman v. DozorcMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McClarty for Fortney v. GudenauDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1995
- Barrows v. BezansonDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996