Legal Opinion
Kight v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 23, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2010-0836PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM
OPINION ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BARBARA J. ROTHSTEIN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Eugene Eight, a former United States Army E-l/Private, brings this action against the United States, asserting that the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (hereinafter “ABCMR” or “the Board”) acted arbitrarily and capriciously when it did not upgrade Eight’s discharge from “other than honorable” (hereinafter “OTH”) to either an honorable discharge or a general discharge with a reentry code that would allow him to reenter the military. Amended Complaint [dkt. # 14] (hereinafter…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- David W. Heisig v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- John F. Kreis v. Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Occidental Engineering Company v. Immigration And Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Michael K. Frizelle v. Rodney E. Slater, Secretary of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bates v. DonleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Martin v. DonleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Nieves v. McHughDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2015
- McDonough v. MabusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Hoffler v. HagelDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.