Legal Opinion

In Re Grand Jury Subpoena

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided June 14, 1988No. Misc. 88-1002PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO QUASH

TODD, District Judge.

Before the court is a motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum issued by a federal grand jury in the course of an investigation. The subpoena requires Dominion Bank of Middle Tennessee (“Bank”), successor in interest to Nashville City Bank and Trust Company, to produce certain financial records maintained by the Bank in the ordinary course of business.

The Bank asserts that the grand jury subpoena does not comply with the provisions of the Tennessee Financial Records Privacy Act (“Act”), T.C.A. §§ 45-10-101 to 116, and that it has a duty not to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Blair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. In the Matter of the Special April 1977 Grand Jury. Appeal of William J. Scott, WitnessCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Walker v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
  2. In Re Grand Jury MatterDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1991
  3. In Re Grand Jury SubpoenaDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2002
  4. In Re Grand Jury SubpoenaDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1999
  5. In Re Grand Jury ProceedingsDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API