Legal Opinion
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided March 15, 1999No. A98-0031 MI (JKS)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: MOTION TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENA
SINGLETON, Chief Judge.
National Bank of Alaska (“NBA”), recipient of a federal grand jury subpoena duces tecum requiring it to produce certain depositor records, filed a motion to quash the subpoena pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17(c). See Docket Nos. 1 (Motion), 7 (Reply). NBA argues that it is prohibited by Alaska statutory law (AS 06.05.175) from complying with the grand jury subpoena until such time as a court order directs compliance. NBA further argues that the grand jury subpoena is unreasonable and oppressive because it…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.