Legal Opinion
Creamer v. Amsterdam High School
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 16, 2000PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
Appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court (Best, J.), entered April 23, 1999 in Montgomery County, which, inter alia, granted plaintiffs’ motion to set aside the verdict as insufficient, denied defendant Dec-Tam Corporation’s motion for common-law indemnification against third-party defendant and denied a motion by defendants Amsterdam High School and Amsterdam Central School District for indemnification against Dec-Tam Corporation, (2) from a judgment of said court, entered October 20, 1999 in Montgomery County, dismissing the complaint against Amsterdam High School and Amsterdam…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lolik v. Big v. Supermarkets, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Rizzuto v. L.A. Wenger Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Selkowitz v. County of NassauNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Chapel v. MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Moffatt v. MoffattNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Ditingo v. DreyfussAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Gong v. GjoniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Evans v. New York City Tr. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019