Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. De Wolfe

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1897No. 2557PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. J. W. Langley, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, C. J.

This was an action to foreclose a lien for a street assessment. The assessment had been levied under § 10 of the 1886 charter of the city of Seattle (Laws 1885-6, p. 243), and became delinquent on the 11th day of August, 1889. A demurrer was interposed to the complaint on the ground that the cause of action was barred by the statute of limitations, which was sustained by the court, and judgment rendered for the defendants. The city has appealed.

*350There was no allegation in the complaint that any steps had been taken to enforce the assessment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Campbell v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. City of Spokane v. StevensWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Packscher v. FullerWashington Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lane v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Noble v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Chambers v. GallagherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Kittilson v. FordCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  5. Douglas County v. Grant CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API