Legal Opinion

Adams v. Bradshaw

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided April 24, 2007No. 1:05 CV 1886PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KATZ, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court upon Petitioner, Stanley T. Adams’s (“Adams” or “Petitioner”) Petition for Writ of Habe-as Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 filed with this Court on May 19, 2006. (ECF 16). Adams challenges his conviction and death sentences imposed by the Court of Common Pleas of Trumbell County, Ohio. The Court has before it the Petition, Respondent, Margaret Bradshaw’s (“Respondent”), Return of Writ (ECF 19), Adams’s Traverse, (ECF 57), and the Respondent’s Reply to Traverse. (ECF 58). For the following reasons, the Petition for Writ…

2Cases cited169 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

164 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wilson v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. VanPelt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  3. Adams v. BradshawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  4. Spence v. SheetsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2009
  5. Thompson v. WilsonDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API