Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 15, 2007No. 03-3362PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.

ROGERS, J. (p. 515), delivered a separate opinion concurring in the result.

OPINION

R. GUY COLE, JR., Circuit Judge.

Petitioner-Appellant Daniel Wilson seeks habeas relief from his conviction and death sentence for the murder of Carol Lutz. After a night of drinking, Wilson put Lutz into the trunk of her car and eventually set the car on fire, killing her. The jury convicted Wilson and found three capital specifications making him eligible for the death penalty: (1) murder committed to escape detection for kidnapping; (2) murder during kidnapping; and (3) murder during aggravated arson. The…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Tucker v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  2. Jalowiec v. BradshawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  3. Bedford v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  4. West v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. Murphy v. OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API