Legal Opinion

Dumus v. Renfroe

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 7, 1964No. 22466PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Presiding Justice.

The petition did not allege facts authorizing an injunction against the dispossessory warrant pending in the Civil Court of Fulton County. However, it did authorize an injunction against an alleged continuing nuisance.

“A nuisance is anything that works hurt, inconvenience, or damage to another; and the fact that the act done may otherwise be lawful shall not keep it from being a nuisance.” Code § 72-101. “Every continuance of a nuisance is a renewal of wrong, and therefore actionable until abated.” Reid v. City of Atlanta, 73 Ga. 523, 525. “By a continuing nuisance is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Americus Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Rounsaville v. KohlheimSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  3. Reid v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  4. Rinzler v. FolsomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  5. Elder v. City of WinderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Padilla v. LawrenceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Holland v. ShackelfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
  3. DeKalb County v. BolickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API