Legal Opinion

Nash v. Curette

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 10, 1952No. 3460PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DORÉ, Judge.

This suit has already been before the Supreme Court on three occasions, the first two being on motion to dismiss plaintiff’s, appeal, see 215 La. 109, 39 So.2d 840, and 216 La. 190, 43 So.2d 262; and the last occasion on the merits, see 218 La. 789, 51 So.2d 71, when the Supreme Court held it lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter and transferred the case to this Court.

The action is in the nature of a petitory action to determine the ownership of a certain triangular tract, approximately one ar-pent in area, lying either within plaintiff’s eastern boundary or the defendants’…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nash v. CuretteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
  2. Franz v. MohrLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Davis v. MooreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  4. Nash v. CuretteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  5. Nash v. CuretteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Collett v. OtisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. State ex rel. Rodi v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API