Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Franz v. Mohr

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 6, 1939No. 16976PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WESTERFIELD, Judge.

This is an action in boundary. The petition alleges that the plaintiff, Miss Irma M. Franz, is the owner of a certain parcel of ground described as follows: “A certain portion of ground, with the improvements thereon and all the appurtenances thereunto belonging, situated in the Sixth District of this City in Square No. 261, bounded by Jena, Chestnut, Camp Streets and Napoleon Avenue. Which said portion of ground measures forty feet front on Jena Street, by one hundred and twenty feet in depth, between parallel lines, and is composed of twenty-two feet of lot ‘E’ and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cragin v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Clapham v. ClaytonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
  3. Sprigg v. HooperSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1844
  4. Davis v. MooreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. New Orleans N.E. R. Co. v. RedmannLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Collett v. OtisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Bryson v. GeorgeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Franz v. MohrLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Holahan v. PhillipsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API