Legal Opinion
Pineau v. White
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided November 5, 1957No. 4589PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.
The Uniform Sales Act gives the buyer of goods a right to rescind the sale and obtain restitution for the amount paid the seller on the ground of breach of warranty. I A Uniform Laws Annotated 295; RSA 346:69 1(d). Furnaces and heating equipment are “goods” within the meaning of the Uniform Sales Act and are governed by its provisions. Parker v. Morgan, 170 Md. 7; RSA 346:76 I. See Francoeur v. Stephen, 97 N. H. 80. Where, as in the present case, rescission takes place after acceptance, the buyer must return or offer to return the goods to the seller in substantially as good condition as they…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mastercraft Wayside Furniture Co. v. Sightmaster Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
- Parker v. Tilghman v. Morgan, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
- Holden v. Advance-Rumely Thresher Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Co., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Brookhaven Manor Water Co., Defendant-Counter-Plaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Baranco v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- O'LAUGHLIN v. Minnesota Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Dudley v. Business Express, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1994
- Meeker v. Hamilton Grain Elevator Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.