Legal Opinion
Michelin Tire Co. v. Akers
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided January 21, 1927No. 2951PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OE THE COURT
WATSON, J.
T. G. Akers and W. K. Jones were sued upon an indebtedness incurred while they were doing business as copartners. The partnership had been dissolved, and Akers had assumed its liabilities. The judgment was against Akers, but in favor of Jones; the court’s conclusion of law being “that the plaintiff at least impliedly released W. K. Jones, and is estopped to hold the defendant, W. K. Jones, for such indebtedness, and cannot now recover from him.” The plaintiff, Michelin Tire Company, appeals.
The bill of exceptions having been stricken (Michelin Tire Co. v. Akers,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Campbell v. FloydSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Johnston v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1835
- Mission Fixture Co. v. PotterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Calkins v. BerlinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- United States v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1832
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- John J. White, Jr. v. William A. BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
- Holland Piano Mfg. Co. v. Homeland Music Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- John J. White, Jr. v. William A. BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961