Legal Opinion
Willingham v. Ashcroft
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 15, 2005No. CIV.A.02-1972 (ESH/JMF)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case was referred to me by Judge Huvelle for the resolution of discovery disputes. Currently pending before me is the issue of whether defendant must produce certain documents, claimed to be privileged and submitted for in camera review, to plaintiff. For the reasons stated herein and in accordance with this Memorandum Order, defendant must produce to plaintiff several of the documents submitted for in camera review.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, an attorney who was an Attorney-Advisor in the Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”), an…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Mead Data Central, Inc. v. United States Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Tax Analysts v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Monroe Adlman, as Officer and Representative of Sequa CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Mobley v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Shapiro v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Federal Trade Commission v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- United States ex rel. Fago v. M & T Mortgage Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.