Legal Opinion
Peterson v. Underwood
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided November 26, 2008No. 105,984. Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 4PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOUG GABBARD II, Presiding Judge.
1 In this malicious prosecution action, Plaintiff, Dr. Michael Peterson, appeals a dismissal granted to Defendant, Charles Snider, and a summary judgment granted to Snider's attorney, Defendant Ken Ray Underwood and the law firm of Ken Ray Underwood, P.C.(collectively, Underwood). We affirm. 1
FACTS
T2 This litigation began when Snider, a truck driver, suffered a job-related injury. He was referred by his employer, Melton Truck Lines, to Peterson, a chiropractor, for treatment. Snider alleged that Peterson negligently manipulated his spine, causing him to suffer…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Reeves v. AgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Indiana National Bank v. State Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Greenberg v. WolfbergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Young v. First State Bank, WatongaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Young v. MacYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Atchison v. City of Tulsa, OklahomaDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2022
- FOX v. FOXCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016
- Lucia Navo v. Bingham Memorial HospitalIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
- Mark Gacek and Pamela Gacek v. Avalon Dunes Condominium Owners Association, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026