FOX v. FOX
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN F. FISCHER, JUDGE:
¶ 1 Thomas Fox appeals the district court’s judgment in favor of the defendants in this malicious prosecution case. The appeal has been assigned to the accelerated docket pursuant to Oklahoma Supreme Court Rule 1.36, 12 O.S. Supp. 2013, ch. 15, app. 1, and the matter stands submitted without appellate briefing. Because the defendants had probable cause to file the action that Thomas claims was malicious, and because the existence of probable cause is an absolute defense to a malicious prosecution action, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 The current litigation arises from a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Carmichael v. BellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Morales v. CITY OF OKL. CITY EX REL. OKL. CITY POLICE DEPT.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
- Lewis v. Crystal Gas CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Poafpybitty v. Skelly Oil CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Towne v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.