Cape Hatteras Access Preservation Alliance v. United States Department of the Interior
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.
A court that orders an administrative agency to supplement the record of its decision is a rare bird. Pending before the Court is the plaintiffs’ motion [16], which asks the Court to do just that, and/or admit extra record evidence. Upon consideration of the motion, the opposition, and the reply thereto, and the entire record herein, the plaintiffs’ motion will be denied for the reasons set forth below.
I. Introduction
The piping plover is a small, sand colored shorebird that nests at beaches in eastern North America, including the Outer Banks…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Axiom Resource Management, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- American Wildlands v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Marcum v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- University of Colorado Health at Memorial Hospital v. BurwellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Center for Native Ecosystems v. SalazarDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2010
- Oceana, Inc. v. RossCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Banner Health v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.