Legal Opinion
Oceana, Inc. v. Ross
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 21, 2018No. Case No. 17–cv–829 (CRC)PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER, United States District Judge
The National Marine Fisheries Service designs management plans to promote the sustainability of particular species of ocean fish. Plaintiff Oceana, Inc. brought suit under the Administrative Procedure Act challenging the Service's management plan for one such species: the dusky shark. But before reaching the merits of that challenge, the Court must first resolve Oceana's motion to compel the Service to complete or supplement the administrative record with four categories of documents: (1) studies and other documents cited in the final…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Coastal States Gas Corporation v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Department of the Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- In re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Fort Sill Apache Tribe v. Nat'l Indian Gaming Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Stand Up for Cal. v. U.S. Dep't of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- UnitedHealthCare Ins. Co. v. AzarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and EnforcementDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Citizens for Constitutional Integrity v. USADistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.