Legal Opinion

Economy Fire & Casualty Co. v. Iverson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 22, 1989No. C1-87-2234PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAHL, Justice.

Economy Fire & Casualty Company (Economy), having brought this declaratory judgment action, appeals a judgment determining that, under the terms of a homeowner’s insurance policy, it was required to provide a defense for its insured, Richard Iverson, in a tort suit brought by Orville Olson. The trial court concluded that the policy provision which excluded acts “expected or intended by the insured” did not exclude coverage for deliberate acts taken in lawful defense of person or property but did not decide the indemnity issue. The court of appeals affirmed. Economy Fire &…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miller v. ShugartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Brown v. State Automobile & Casualty UnderwritersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Morrison v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  4. Republic Vanguard Insurance Co. v. BuehlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  5. Lanoue v. Fireman's Fund American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Farmers & Mechanics Mutual Insurance Co. of West Virginia v. CookWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage LitigationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  3. Haarstad v. GraffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  4. American Standard Insurance Co. v. LeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  5. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. National Computer Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API