Legal Opinion

Moore v. Conifer Corp.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 8, 1988No. 87-130PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

The issue before us in this workers’ compensation case is whether a hearings officer for the department of labor (department) may suspend a claimant’s benefits on the procedural ground that the claimant, who was represented by counsel, did not appear personally at a labor department hearing. The Trial Court {Gray, J.) reversed the hearings officer’s order suspending payment of benefits pending plaintiff’s personal appearance. The defendants appeal, and for the reasons that follow, we affirm.

The plaintiff, Denise Moore, sustained a work-related injury in May, 1985, for which she was awarded…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carveth v. LathamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
  2. Ryan v. Perini Power Constructors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  3. Ela v. ElaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1895
  4. Milkovich v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. TseliosSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  2. Bogardus v. ZinkeviczSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API