Legal Opinion

Bogardus v. Zinkevicz

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 31, 1991No. 89-455PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

The plaintiffs appeal a decision by the Superior Court (M. Flynn, J.), denying their petition for a permanent injunction to enforce a restrictive covenant on the defendants’ property. The trial court ruled that the plaintiffs’ claim was barred under the doctrine of laches, and found that enforcement of the covenant would result in hardship to the defendants and constitute economic waste. We reverse and remand.

The facts found by the trial court include the following. The plaintiffs and the defendants are owners of lots in a residential subdivision in Derry, known as Olde County Estates. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McDonough v. WW Snow Construction Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1973
  2. Jenot v. White Mountain Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  3. Gauthier v. RobinsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  4. Chagnon Lumber Co., Inc. v. DeMulderSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  5. New Hampshire Donuts, Inc. v. SkipitarisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barrows v. BolesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  2. Healey v. New Durham Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  3. J. William Winney, Jr. v. Michael Troy JerupWyoming Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Hudon v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  5. Appeal of BelairSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API