Legal Opinion
Carveth v. Latham
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 30, 1970No. 5922PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLampron, J.
Action by plaintiff doing business in Auburn, State of California, to recover for damages caused to plaintiff’s car during the time defendant had the use of it. The writ was returnable in the Concord District Court the first Tuesday of November 1966. By order of the court, dated May 28, 1968, the case was scheduled for hearing on June 6, 1968. Notice of this order was mailed to counsel for the parties.
On the day set for hearing, plaintiff’s counsel was present in court but not plaintiff. After making an opening statement, plaintiff’s counsel called the defendant to the witness stand. When no…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Teitelman v. BloomsteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Armende Lesser, Appellant-Appellee v. Morris Migden, Trustee, Appellee-Appellant. In the Matter of Mike Misuirello, BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Hughes v. HebertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1965
3Cited by8 opinions
- King v. MooreheadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
- Doggett v. Town of North Hampton Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- State v. TseliosSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
- Barton v. BartonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- Roberts v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.