Legal Opinion
Miller v. Minneapolis, Saint Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 26, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCmnsTTANSON, J.
This is an action for personal injuries, brought under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act. It was tried to a jury, and a verdict returned in favor of the plaintiff for $500. Defendant moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or for a new trial. The motion was denied, and defendant has appealed from the judgment.
The sole question presented on this appeal is the sufficiency of the. ' evidence to sustain the verdict. In other words, it is contended by the defendant that the court erred in denying its motion for a directed verdict and its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.
Th…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. De AtleySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Illinois Central Railroad v. SkaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Weinman v. De PalmaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pederson v. O'RourkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
- Johnson v. Minneapolis, St. P. S. Ste. M.R. Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
- Prefontaine v. Great Northern Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
- Sullivan v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1927