Legal Opinion

Kimbel v. Lumber & Saw Mill Workers Union No. 2575

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1937No. 26450. Department TwoPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

In his complaint, plaintiff alleged that he was engaged in logging operations in Mason county; that the defendant Lumber & Saw Mill Workers Union No. 2575 (hereinafter referred to as Union 2575) claimed jurisdiction over the territory within which plaintiff was operating; that defendants Carlson and Davis were officers of the union, and the defendants named’ as John Doe and Bichard Boe were, on behalf of defendant union, picketing plaintiff’s logs; that defendant Lumber & Saw Mill Workers Union No. 2515 (hereinafter referred to as Union 2515) is a labor union, having its headquarters at…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. Golden Age Brewing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Sterling Chain Theaters, Inc. v. Central Labor CouncilWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Adams v. Local No. 400 of Cooks & HelpersWashington Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Gazzam v. Building Service Employees International Union, Local 262Washington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Fornili v. Auto Mechanics' Union Local No. 297 of the International Ass'n of MacHinistsWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. O'Neil v. Building Service Employees International Union, Local No. 6Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Blossom Dairy Co. v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. City of Yakima v. GorhamWashington Supreme Court · 1939

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API