Shore v. Farmer
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
LAKE, Justice.
The question presented for review is whether the Court of Appeals erred in concluding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by allowing plaintiff to amend her complaint to seek punitive damages in an action sounding in contract. In the decision below, the Court of Appeals concluded that the trial court did not err in allowing plaintiff’s motion to amend her pleadings to conform to the evidence because there was no showing that the amendment in some way prejudiced defendant in maintaining his defense. Since we conclude that the evidence in this case does not support a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Newton v. Standard Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Taha v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Shore v. FarmerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
3Cited by19 opinions
- Eli Research, Inc. v. United Communications Group, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
- McDevitt v. StacyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Akzo Nobel Coatings Inc. v. RogersNorth Carolina Business Court · 2011
- VF Jeanswear Ltd. Partnership v. MolinaDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
- Zubaidi v. Earl L. Pickett Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.