Legal Opinion

Lydia v. Horton

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 14, 2003No. 25675PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Toal

We granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ determination that Petitioner is liable on a first party negligent entrustment claim because he allowed an intoxicated person to borrow his car.

Factual/Procedural Background

According to the Complaint, Respondent, Mitchell Lydia (“Lydia”), was intoxicated on April 27, 1995, when Petitioner, Steve Horton (“Horton”), allowed Lydia to borrow his car. Lydia’s Complaint alleges that Horton either knew or should have known that Lydia was not competent to operate the vehicle. Lydia then drove the car in his intoxicated state and wrecked the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. El Chico Corp. v. PooleTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Mary Ann Waynick v. Chicago's Last Department Store, an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
  3. Nelson v. Concrete Supply CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  4. Creech v. South Carolina Wildlife & Marine Resources DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  5. Christiansen v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bailey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Martell v. DriscollSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  3. Hays v. RoyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Herland v. IzattUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Donze v. General Motors, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API