Legal Opinion

Capitol Fish Co. v. Tanner

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 6, 1989No. A89A0509PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Birdsong, Judge.

This discretionary appeal was granted to determine whether the employer, Capitol Fish Company d/b/a Capitol Foods of Augusta, Inc. (Capitol), is immune to tort liability, by being in the status of an “employer” bound to provide workers’ compensation benefits for the deceased helper for one of Capitol’s drivers.

Taken in the light most favorable to the appellee plaintiff, who filed this wrongful death suit and is respondent in Capitol’s motion for summary judgment, the material facts are these: the deceased was hired and employed as helper by Capitol’s employee truck driver. The…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wright Associates, Inc. v. RiederSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  2. American Mutual Liability Insurance v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  3. Equitable Life Assurance Society v. BischoffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  4. Haygood v. Home Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  5. Rogers v. Miller Peanut CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Redfearn v. Huntcliff Homes Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  2. Sykes v. Smolek Grading, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  3. Reynolds v. McKenzie-Perry Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  4. Capitol Fish Co. v. TannerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. Liniado v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API