Legal Opinion

Jain v. Kumar

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided July 29, 2021No. 2:21-cv-02126Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS SAMEER JAIN, UPMA JAIN, Plaintiffs, vs. Case No. 2:21-CV-02126-EFM-GEB RANDEL SOLUTIONS, LLC, KULTURE KURRY, LLC, KANSAS KURRY, LLC, ROUSHAN KUMAR, ANJUSHREE KUMAR, Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiffs Sameer Jain and Upma Jain filed suit against Defendants Randel Solutions, LLC, Kulture Kurry, LLC, Kansas Kurry, LLC, Roushan Kumar, and Dr. Anjushree Kumar alleging (1) a civil action under federal law for forced labor, (2) a civil action under Kansas law for human trafficking, (3) a civil action for violations of the Kansas…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API