Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Diamond State Bus Lines, Inc.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided October 3, 1956No. 427PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Layton, J.:

Plaintiffs filed the following interrogatory:

“Plaintiffs repropound the following interrogatory which shall be deemed to be continuing, so as to require supplemental, answers if defendants, or either of them, obtained further information between the time answers are served and the time of trial.”
“1. State the names and addresses of all the passengers who were on the bus at the time of the accident involved in the present suit, insofar as such names and addresses are known or available to the defendants, or either of them.”

Defendant agrees to furnish the names and addresses of all…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nathan v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  2. Gebhard v. NiedzwieckiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  3. Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Lunn v. United Aircraft Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1960
  5. Pare v. RodriqueCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API