Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Diamond State Bus Lines, Inc.
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided October 3, 1956No. 427PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Layton, J.:
Plaintiffs filed the following interrogatory:
“Plaintiffs repropound the following interrogatory which shall be deemed to be continuing, so as to require supplemental, answers if defendants, or either of them, obtained further information between the time answers are served and the time of trial.”
“1. State the names and addresses of all the passengers who were on the bus at the time of the accident involved in the present suit, insofar as such names and addresses are known or available to the defendants, or either of them.”
Defendant agrees to furnish the names and addresses of all…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Nathan v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Gebhard v. NiedzwieckiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Lunn v. United Aircraft Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1960
- Pare v. RodriqueCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969