Legal Opinion
National Waterworks Co. v. Kansas City
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri
Decided December 1, 1896No. Nos. 1,783, 1,868PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREWER, Circuit Justice.
This matter comes before me on exceptions to the report of the master on the intervening petition of L. A. Coquard and others. The original suits were in equity, between Kansas City and the National Waterworks Company, in reference to the sale of the plant of the latter to the former. This litigation was protracted through several years, and the facts concerning it may be found fully stated in prior opinions. See 10 C. C. A. 653, 62 Fed. 853; 65 Fed. 691. By the terms of the final decree, entered on November 28, 1891, the city was ordered to pay §3,000,600 for the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Peters v. BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Townsend v. LittleSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Kirby v. TallmadgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- National Waterworks Co. v. Kansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
- Crumlish v. Railroad Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Central Trust Co. v. Cincinnati, H. & D. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1908
- Brennan v. Emery-Bird-Thayer Dry-Goods Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1900
- Central Trust Co. v. Denver & R. G. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
- Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Brooklyn Rapid Transit Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1922