Central Trust Co. v. Cincinnati, H. & D. Ry. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio
In Equity. On application for leave to intervene.
1Opinion of the Court
LURTON, Circuit Judge.
This cause is now heard upon an application of the Brooklyn Trust Company and other corporations for leave to intervene and become defendants herein and to file an answer and cross-bill. For the purpose of obtaining admission as defendants, the proposed answer and cross-bill is presented, and leave to file same is sought. The Central Trust Company has objected, and counsel for the proposed interveners and that company have been heard orally and by brief.
The proceeding in which the interveners want to intervene is a simple mortgage foreclosure suit in which the Central…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Curtis and Others v. . LeavittNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Dickerman v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Galveston Railroad v. CowdreySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Guaranty Trust and Safe Deposit Co. v. Green Cove Springs and Melrose RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Palmer v. Bankers' Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Abney-Barnes Co. v. Davy-Pocahontas Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
- Union Trust Co. of Pittsburgh, PA. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1926
- Fidelity Trust Co. v. Washington-Oregon Corp.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1914
- ACME White Lead & Color Works v. Republic Motor Truck Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.