Legal Opinion

United States v. One Bally "Barrel-O-Fun" Coin-Operated Gaming Device

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 31, 1963No. Civ. 8116PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEALON, District Judge.

On March 28, 1963, agents of the Internal Revenue Service seized two coin-operated machines, to wit: one Bally "“Barrel-O-Fun” Coin-Operated Device, Serial No. B83483391, and one Bally '“Lotta Fun” Coin-Operated Device, Serial No. B57634263, from premises located at 402 Pittston Avenue, Scranton, Pennsylvania.

A complaint was filed on April 5, 1963, by Hugo Brozzetti (Civil Action No. 8062), alleging he is the owner of the two coin-operated devices, and by George Brocaviteh, who asserts that (a) he is the operator of George’s Lunch at 402 Pittston Avenue, Scranton,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. South Texas Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Fawcus MacHine Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Mandel Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. United States v. One Ford Coupe AutomobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. United States v. One 1956 Ford Tudor Sedan (Victoria) Motor No. M6nv-112513 (Steve Kaluk, Jr., Claimant)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Farley v. $168,400.97Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  2. Fell v. ArmourDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1972
  3. United States v. 294 Various Gambling DevicesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Automatic Music & Vending Corp. v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  5. United States v. One Hundred Thirty-Seven (137) Draw Poker-Type MacHines & Six (6) Slot MacHinesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API