Legal Opinion

England v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided January 17, 1925No. A-4677PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

Only two assignments of error are argued by the appellant: First, that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict of the jury; second, the failure of the court to instruct on the defense of alibi.

The state relies wholly upon circumstantial evidence. The evidence clearly shows that some one set fire to the house in which the plaintiff in error lived as a tenant. The connection of the plaintiff in error with such fire is not evident. The circumstances surrounding it are few. No motive whatever on the part of plaintiff in error is shown for the commission of the offense; nor are we able…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Inklebarger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Sies v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Broshears v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stuart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Dean v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Gransbury v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. York v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Berrie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API